Please help with this assignment. Please use the following Scenario AND the attached rubric to complete this assignment. Please STRICTLY follow all prompts listed on the rubric! Scenario: You walk in

Please help with this assignment. Please use the following Scenario AND the attached rubric to complete this assignment. Please STRICTLY follow all prompts listed on the rubric! Scenario: You walk in
IHP 355 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview: You will now complete a gap analysis and supply executive leadership with recommendations for how to address gaps identified. Prompt: In Milestone One , you identified a specific safety i ssue from the given scenario and analyzed the regulations and accreditation standards associated with that issue and their impact on your organization. For Milestone Two, you will submit a draft of your gap analysis with recommendations. Your draft shoul d explain the process that is in place or should be in place for approaching regulatory or accrediting compliance and determine current or potential gaps related to your chosen safety issue. In addition, you should draft your recommendations for corrective action strategies, defend your strategies, and explain a compliance program and how you will track compliance . Specifically , the following critical elements must be addressed: II. Gap Analysis : In this section, you will conduct a gap analysis and explain t he key elements of any compliance plans that are in place (or should be in place). Be sure to: A. Explain the process that is in place or should be in place for approaching regulatory or accrediting compliance . For example, what actions has the department tak en to ensure compliance? What are the procedures or strategies employed or should be employed by the department to maintain compliance? B. Determine current or potential gaps in the regulatory or accrediting compliance of the healthcare department or system. In other words, is the department compliant with appropriate regulations or accreditation? What gaps are present regarding compliance? III. Recommendations : In this section, imagine you are preparing recommendations for your supervisor regarding the regulato ry or accreditation compliance of the department. Specifically: A. Recommend corrective action strategies that address your described gaps and meet the compliance requirements of the regulating bodies or accrediting agencies that would apply to the department or system. B. Defend your strategies by explaining the implications for the department or system if the previously identified gaps are not addressed. In other words, what could happen to the department if it did not follow your recommendations? C. Explain how you would establish an accreditation or compliance program for the department or system. Be sure to relate implementing your program with previously identified gaps. In other words, explain how you would implement your recommendations regarding accre ditat ion or a compliance program. D. Explain how you would collect meaningful data to track compliance with your corrective action plan. Consider different ways to go about tracking this compliance. Guidelines for Submission: This milestone should adhere to the follo wing format ting requirements: 3–4 pages, double -spaced, all references cited in APA format . Rubric Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Gap Analysis: Approaching Regulatory or Accrediting Compliance Explains the process that is in place for approaching regulatory or accrediting compliance Explains the process that is in place for approaching regulatory or accrediting compliance, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not explain the process that is in place for approaching regulatory or accrediting compliance 15 Gap Analysis: Regulatory or Accrediting Compliance Determines gaps that are present in the regulatory or accrediting compliance of the healthcare department or system Determ ines gaps that are present in the regulatory or accrediting compliance of the healthcare department or system, but response is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not determine gaps that are present in the regulatory or accrediting compliance of the heal thcare department or system 15 Recommendations: Address Recommends corrective action strategies that address described gaps and meet compliance requirements of applicable regulating bodies or accrediting agencies Recommends corrective action strategies that address described gaps and meet compliance requirements of applicable regulating bodies or accrediting agencies, but recommendations are cursory or illogical Does not recommend corrective action strategies that address described gaps and meet the comp liance requirements of applicable regulating bodies or accrediting agencies 15 Recommendations: Implications Defends strategies by explaining the implications for the department or system if the previously identified gaps are not addressed Defends strat egies by explaining the implications for the department or system if the previously identified gaps are not addressed, but defense is cursory or illogical Does not defend strategies by explaining the implications for the department or system if the previou sly identified gaps are not addressed 15 Recommendations: Establish Explains how to establish an accreditation or compliance program for the department or system, relating program to previously identified gaps Explains how to establish an accreditation o r compliance program for the department or system, but explanation is cursory, illogical or does not related to previously identified gaps Does not explain how to establish an accreditation or compliance program for the department or system 15 Recommendat ions: Track Compliance Explains how one would collect meaningful data to track compliance with corrective action plan, considering different means of tracking Explains how one would collect meaningful data to track compliance with your corrective action p lan, considering different means of tracking, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not explain how one would collect meaningful data to track compliance with corrective action plan 15 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%