critical evaluation report.- Only Medicine Related Tutors . Others no need to apply and ask for work

critical evaluation report.- Only Medicine Related Tutors . Others no need to apply and ask for work
SONM Use Only Assessment 3: Critical Evaluation 2300 words The aim of this assignment is to critically evaluate a journal article. This will provide you with the skills and knowledge to be able to evaluate the quality and relevance of research so that you can make informed decisions about applying it to practice. This assignment addresses the following course learning outcome/s: Examine the contribution of research to evidence-based practice; Evaluate the credibility of the information provided by research studies; Demonstrate understanding of the major elements of the research process that underpin translation to practice. Task Description (Instructions): For this task you need to write a 2300 word critical evaluation report. In your report you will critically evaluate a journal article and discuss its relevance to clinical nursing practice. You must choose to evaluate a Randomised Controlled Trial OR a Qualitative Study (see below). For this report you must use the ‘critical evaluation tool template’ (available below) to guide what information to include in each section. The template is your guide only and is not to be submitted. In your report you must use the following headings: Introduction (200 words) Title and Abstract (100 words) Structuring the Study (300 words) The sample (150 words) Data Collection (300 words) Data Analysis (300 words) Findings (300 words) Conclusion (150 words) Relevance to clinical nursing practice (500 words) You need to include a reference list (not included in word count). Case Studies – You need to choose ONE of these case studies to evaluate in your report. CHOICE 1: Randomised Controlled Trial, Case Study Journal Article: Bugden, S., Shean, K., Scott, M., Mihala, G., Clark, S., Johnstone, C., … Rickard, C. (2016). Skin glue reduces the failure rate of emergency department-inserted peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 68, 196–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.026 What the study is about: Peripheral intravenous catheters are the most commonly used medical invasive device in hospitals today and are frequently initiated in the emergency department. Peripheral intravenous catheter failure frequently occurs after 48 hours post insertion, suggesting that improvements in securement can be targeted at this timeframe. A novel approach for improved peripheral intravenous catheter fixation is the use of medical-grade skin glue (cyanoacrylate) at the insertion site. Skin glue has been reported to be effective for securing central venous, epidural, and peripheral arterial catheters, with improved fixation compared with standard polyurethane dressings. CHOICE 2: Qualitative Study, Case Study Journal article: Bernoth, M., Dietsch, E., & Davies, C. (2013). Two dead frankfurts and a blob of sauce: The serendipity of receiving nutrition and hydration in Australian residential aged care. Collegian, 21, 171-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.colegn.2013.02.001 What the study is about: Social relationships have been repeatedly identified as essential to nursing home resident quality of life, life meaning and satisfaction, and psychological wellbeing. Articulating the views of residents, and the work residents engage in to develop relationships with both peers and staff, is necessary to facilitate identification of opportunities for targeted interventions that promote, support, and sustain relationships in practice. Other elements: Ensure that you use scholarly literature1 (digitised readings, research articles, relevant Government reports and text books) that have been published within the last 6 years. Use academic language2 throughout. You need to adhere strictly to the word limit. Refer to the Assignment Presentation Formatting Guidelines for more information about word limits. 1 Scholarly or peer-reviewed journal articles are written by scholars or professionals who are experts in their fields, as opposed to literature such as magazine articles, which reflect the tastes of the general public and are often meant as entertainment. 2 Everyday language is predominantly subjective. It is mainly used to express opinions based on personal preference or belief rather than evidence. Written academic English is formal. It avoids colloquialisms and slang, which may be subject to local and social variations. Formal language is more precise and stable, and therefore more suitable for the expression of complex ideas and the development of reasoned argumentation. Formatting and Submission Please submit your Report as ONE document that includes (in this order): 2. Assignment Title Page with correct details. 3. Your report, appropriately formatted (font, line spacing, margins, page numbers, student number etc.). 4. Reference list on a separate sheet and appropriately formatted. This is additional to the word limit. 4
critical evaluation report.- Only Medicine Related Tutors . Others no need to apply and ask for work
Critical Evaluation Marking Guidelines CRITERIA POSSIBLE MARK CRITERIA ONE: Demonstrate knowledge of the research components of a research paper A high level response will: accurately identify and explain the different elements of the research process that are evident in the chosen article. /30 CRITERIA TWO: Evaluates the research and discusses the implications for nursing practice A high level response will: critically evaluate the research elements using the critical evaluation tool with reference to a range of recent, relevant and scholarly literature. provide a scholarly and concise, evidence – based discussion of the significant implications of the research for contemporary nursing practice.Provided a thoughtful and concise evidence based discussion of the significant implications of the research for contemporary nursing practice and standards of care. /50 CRITERIA THREE: Demonstrate scholarly presentation of work A high level response will: be smooth and coherent with succinct expression. conform to the structure provided in the template. include correct spelling, grammar, and well-constructed sentences and paragraphs. adhere strictly to the word limit and the Assignment Presentation Formatting Guidelines. /15 REFERENCING5 Report is supported by a range of recent and relevant scholarly sources. Report is referenced and formatted correctly according to APA 6th edition conventions. There is a separate page for reference list. /5 Total Marks [weighted at 30%] /100 Feedback and feed forward: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Name and signature of marker: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
critical evaluation report.- Only Medicine Related Tutors . Others no need to apply and ask for work
SONM Use Only Critical Evaluation 2300 words Weighting 50 % Critical Evaluation Tool template (Quantitative Study) PICO(T) Complete this table (Not for submission) What is the problem/population? What is the intervention? What is the Comparator? What is the primary outcome? What are the secondary outcome/s? What was the Length of Time of the intervention? Introduction (200 words) Model for critique Identify other models that can be used for research critique and appraisal. Journal Present an overview of this journal e.g. Briefly determine if it is a highly regarded journal by impact factor, ranking or ERA ranking. In what country is the journal published? How will this information about the journal affect your decision when considering using this research in practice? Authors Are there any authors who are experts in the field? How can you tell? Identify the institution where the research was conducted. How will this information about the authors affect your decision when considering using this research in practice? Title and Abstract (100 words) a. Is the title of the research paper congruent with the text? b. Were the aims and/or objectives stated? What are they? c. Did the abstract contain information about the stages of the research process (e.g., aims, hypothesis, research design, sample, instruments and findings)? Explain these. Structuring the study (300 words) a. Is the motivation for the study demonstrated through the literature review? Provide a summary of the Background/literature review. b. Is the literature cited current, relevant and comprehensive? Are the references recent? c. What is the recognised gap in the reviewed literature? d. How was the investigation carried out? e. Is the hypothesis stated? f. If so, which hypothesis is stated: the scientific hypothesis or the null hypothesis? g. Does the hypothesis indicate that the researcher is interested in testing for differences between groups or in testing for relationships? The sample (150 words) a. Is the sample described? b. How was the sample size determined? Data collection (300 words) a. How were the data collected (questionnaires or other data collection tools)? b. Who collected the data? c. Are the data adequately described? d. What is the origin of the measurement instruments? e. Are the instruments adequately described? f. Were the data collection instruments valid or validated? g. Was the reliability of the measurement instruments assessed or reported? h. Were ethical issues discussed? Data analysis (300 words) (See chapter on Making Sense of Statistical Results in the eText) a. Was the follow-up complete enough to make the results credible? b. Was the assessment “blind” or masked to avoid performance bias? c. Are the results statistically or clinically significant? d. Were the statistics primarily descriptive, correlational or inferential? e. Identify the outcome of each statistical analysis. f. Explain the meaning of each outcome analysed. Findings (300 words) a. Were the findings expected? b. Is there enough information present to judge the results? c. Are the results clearly and completely stated? d. Summarise the researcher’s report of the findings. e. Identify any limitations in the study. f. Were suggestions for further research made? g. Did the researcher mention the implications of the study for healthcare? h. Was there sufficient information in the report to permit replication of the study? Conclusion (150 words) a. What did the authors conclude was their most important finding and what is the relevance of that finding? Relevance to nursing practice (500 words) Critically evaluate, with reference to a range of recent, scholarly literature, how this research is relevant to the clinical nursing setting using the principles of evidence based practice. These include: Patient values Clinical expertise Available evidence References Critical Evaluation Tool Template (Qualitative Study) Complete this table (Not for submission) Population Phenomena of Interest Context Introduction (200 words) Model for critique Discuss other models that can be used for research critique and appraisal. This question is about the Journal Present a short synopsis of this journal. Determine if it is a highly regarded journal by impact factor. In what country is the journal published? How will this information about the journal affect your decision when considering using this research in practice? This question is about Authors of the article Present a short, cumulative summary of the authors e.g., what are their professional backgrounds? Are there any experts in the field? How can you tell? Give some information about the institution where the research was conducted. How will this information about the authors affect your decision when considering using this research in practice? Title and abstract (100 words) a. Is the title of the research paper concise, clear and congruent with the text? b. Were the aims and/or objectives stated? What are they? c. Did the abstract contain sufficient information about the stages of the research process (e.g., aims, research approach, participants, data collection, data analysis, findings)? Identifying the phenomenon/phenomena of interest (200 words) a. Is the phenomenon focussed on human experience within a natural setting? b. Is the phenomenon relevant to nursing, midwifery and/or health? Structuring the Study (300 words) a. Is it clear that the selected participants are living the phenomenon of interest? b. How is published literature used in the study? (Provide a summary of the literature review). c. Does the question identify the context (participant/groups/place) of the method to be followed? d. Is the theoretical framework clearly stated? e. Does the theoretical framework fit the research question? f. Is the method of data collection and analysis clearly specified? g. Does the qualitative method of data collection chosen fit the research question (e.g Grounded theory, Ethnography etc.) h. Are the limitations to the study stated? Research question and design (200 words) a. Was the research question determined by the need for the study? How was this determination made? b. Are the data collection strategies appropriate for the research question? c. Do the data collection strategies reflect the purpose and theoretical framework of the study (e.g. in-depth interviewing, focus groups etc.)? d. Can the data analysis strategy be identified and logically followed? Participants (150 words) a. How were the participants and setting selected (e.g. sampling strategies used)? b. How was confidentiality of the participants assured? c. How was the anonymity of participants assured? d. What ethical issues were identified in the study? e. How were ethical issues addressed? Data Analyses (150 words) a. How were the data analysed b. Is the analysis technique congruent with the research question? c. Is there evidence that the researcher’s interpretation captured the participant’s meaning? d. Did the researcher say how the criteria for judging the scientific rigour of the study were maintained in terms of credibility, auditability, fittingness and confirmability? Describing the findings (300 words) a. Does the researcher demonstrate to the reader the method (e.g. audit trail) by which the data were analysed? b. Does the researcher indicate how the findings are related to theory? c. Is there a link between the findings to existing theory or literature, or is a new theory generated? Researcher’s perspective (200 words) a. Are the biases of the researcher reported (e.g. researcher/participant expectations, researcher bias and power imbalance)? b. Are the limitations of the study acknowledged? c. Are recommendations suggested for further research? d. Are implications for healthcare mentioned? Relevance to nursing practice (500 words) Critically evaluate, with reference to a range of recent, scholarly literature, how this research is relevant to the clinical nursing setting using the principles of evidence based practice. These include: Patient values Clinical expertise Available evidence References 7